[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
A hack we've been using -- is this OK, or likely to fail?
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
A hack we've been using -- is this OK, or likely to fail? |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:09:17 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 |
I meant to mention this in my previous mail, but forgot.
Because we have developers using distributions for which it's not easy
to upgrade to the latest libtool, instead of using
libfoo_la_LIBADD = ../somedir/libbar.la
to indicate inter-lib dependencies, we've been using
libfoo_la_LIBADD = -L../somedir -L../somedir/.libs -lbar
This has made me a little nervous, so I wanted to check to see if this
is likely to work OK, either under 1.4.2 or prior versions, or if this
could be expected to cause trouble.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- A hack we've been using -- is this OK, or likely to fail?,
Rob Browning <=