[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug).
From: |
Paul Davis |
Subject: |
Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug). |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2001 12:57:07 -0500 |
>> what is any of this for in the first place?
>
>You mean why do we allos someone to define lt_dlmalloc, lt_dlrealloc,
>and lt_dlfree? I don't know :)
yes, thats precisely what i mean. what problem is this attempting to
solve? some bizarre platform where ltdl.c can't call malloc()?
--p
Re: ltdl.c thinks it's psychic (another SEGFAULT bug)., Olly Betts, 2001/11/07