[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Fwd:]

From: Robert Collins
Subject: RE: [Fwd:]
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 22:24:18 +1100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Matz [mailto:address@hidden 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:12 PM

> On a related note.  How long do we want to support that cruft 
> at all?  I
> mean the pre- and postdeps.   Objects and libraries.  I'm not 
> aware of any
> current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers) 
> which need that explicit linking.  Instead a simple "g++ 
> -shared -o works". Well, yes, those only having a 
> static libstdc++ are screwed, but so what?

Well that's quite a few of us (cygwin, mingw)!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]