[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Fwd: ltmain.in]
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
RE: [Fwd: ltmain.in] |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 22:24:18 +1100 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Matz [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:12 PM
> On a related note. How long do we want to support that cruft
> at all? I
> mean the pre- and postdeps. Objects and libraries. I'm not
> aware of any
> current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers)
> which need that explicit linking. Instead a simple "g++
> -shared -o libbla.so works". Well, yes, those only having a
> static libstdc++ are screwed, but so what?
Well that's quite a few of us (cygwin, mingw)!
Rob