[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage
From: |
Marc Espie |
Subject: |
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:40:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 08:26:14PM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> > I really would like to know what the solution is. Specifically, what's
> > the deal with -module -avoid-version ? Either I need to have a way to
> > differentiate with stuff that will be used with dlopen, or linked in as
>
> Hmm, I really thought, that the various BSDs have patches for exactly this
> problem in their ports tree. At least I got the patches from someone from
> NetBSD.
Where do you think the patches come from ? someone has to write them in
the first place. As far as OpenBSD is concerned, that's me or
address@hidden, mainly.
Well, I have patches to handle this problem. But this is getting tedious,
because those patches are dirty. Because libtool support of OpenBSD is
not up-todate. Because there are always new versions, new snapshots of
libtool, which are incompatible with the previous one. And every time,
I get to reinvent the wheel, and dive into those dreadful autoconf macros
and huge shell-scripts.
And frankly, I'm a bit fed up of that.
- libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage, Marc Espie, 2002/04/11
- Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage, Michael Matz, 2002/04/11
- Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage,
Marc Espie <=
- Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage, Michael Matz, 2002/04/11
- Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage, Nick Hudson, 2002/04/12
- Prev by Date:
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage
- Next by Date:
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage
- Previous by thread:
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage
- Next by thread:
Re: libtool, OpenBSD, plugins, large breakage
- Index(es):