[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: install vs cp
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: install vs cp |
Date: |
12 Apr 2002 20:15:18 +0100 |
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 07:06, ahoward wrote:
>
> can anyone comment on why using cp instead of install should make a
> difference? i've even notice weird behavior using different install
> programs.
Are the ownership or permissions on the installed file different when
using one vs. another?
Are there timing issues between the unload/reload in the daemon, and the
change of contents of the inode? If so you might see what appear to be
differences caused by the installation tool that you use, but are
actually random errors based on the timing issue.
Food for thought.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk
,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \'
`&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
=`---d__/
- install vs cp, ahoward, 2002/04/10
- Re: install vs cp,
Gary V. Vaughan <=