[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin
From: |
Nick Hudson |
Subject: |
Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:01:17 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Monday 25 November 2002 2:43 pm, Max Horn wrote:
> An alternate solution might be to change the kbackgammon exectuable
> to load the kbackgammon.so, too, instead of linking against it. Or is
> there anything else that needs to link against these loadable modules?
Why? What benefit is there in doing it that way?
Nick
- Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin, (continued)
Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin, Nick Hudson, 2002/11/25
Re: libtool "module" behavior and darwin, Guido Draheim, 2002/11/25
Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin, Max Horn, 2002/11/25
- Re: [Fink-devel] libtool "module" behavior and darwin,
Nick Hudson <=