[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: hppa*64* and dependent libraries

From: Boehne, Robert
Subject: RE: hppa*64* and dependent libraries
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:45:36 -0500


Post the patch you have for 1.4.  I'm curious as to why you need to set $wl at all,
if linking is being done with "ld" then ${wl}="" for any flag.  IMHO, if that
isn't being done properly we need to find out why.



-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Chin [mailto:address@hidden]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 5:18 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: hppa*64* and dependent libraries

On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 03:22:42AM -0600, Albert Chin wrote:
However, I now have the problem that I need '+b' for ld and '-Wl,+b'
for cc. Because there is not a separate $hardcode_libdir_flag_spec for
ld/cc, I have to hack libtool.m4 like:
  case "${LD}" in
  eval dep_rpath=\"$hardcode_libdir_flag_spec\"

This is gross. I have no problem modifying $hardcode_libdir_flag_spec
so it's rewritten as:

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]