[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC
From: |
Simon Richter |
Subject: |
Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:00:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hi,
> Good point, we never really resolved this issue.
> All in favor of dropping -DPIC entirely say "I"!
I'm against it.
If you have optimized assembler versions of some code for some platforms
(like the STL has, for example) and some of that code is not PIC, it is
a good idea to enclose it in #ifndef PIC. So dropping -DPIC will remove
an useful feature and make everything that uses it miscompile (for some
platforms, in a fatal way).
Simon
--
GPG Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
pgpImbLcseEmo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- RE: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/15
- Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Simon Richter, 2003/01/15
- [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Robert Boehne, 2003/01/15
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Simon Richter, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Boehne, Robert, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Problem on rs6000-ibm-aix4.3.2.0 (Fortran) -DPIC, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/16