Re: Libtool 1.5 on MacOS X

[Peter O'Gorman]

On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 11:54  PM, Marcus G. Daniels wrote:

> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>
> > Because of the way things are set up, adding fsf gcc support is 
> > essentially adding a completely different compiler. Depending on my 
> > available free time, I may decide to revisit this issue, do you 
> > really think it is required?
>
> With stock GCC 3.3, most if not all of the Apple-like command line 
> options are processed just as they are on the compiler distributed by 
> Apple.  Take a look at the sources and you'll see there are hooks for 
> this.  For libtool 1.5, treating stock GCC 3.3 like Apple's GCC works 
> for me to generate dynamic libraries and executables.

I just did have a quick peek at the sources, looks like you are indeed 
correct. I will submit a patch to the list tomorrow. To excuse myself 
here, almost none of these flags were passed through by the gcc-3.2 fsf 
gcc which was available when I first looked at this issue.

Thanks,
Peter