[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cyclic dependencies

From: Steve M. Robbins
Subject: Re: Cyclic dependencies
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:01:33 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 10:25:49AM +1000, Kevin Ryde wrote:
> Thomas Maier <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > if linux's behaviour is really extraordinary or if systems
> > with such limited library features are slowly dying away?
> Making just one pass across a -lfoo library at its point in the
> command line is traditional unix style, for ".a" libraries.  


> I'm not certain but I guess shared libraries and runtime binding are
> why things seem looser these days.

Yeah.  But you really should get things in order anyway, just in you
want to link it -static someday.  I learned that one the hard way: try
figuring out the correct order for all those pesky X libraries
sometime!  ;-)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]