RE: Fixing malloc.h related warning

[Boehne, Robert]

Dalibor,

Ok, I checked that both headers are checked for, and they are, so
the only unresolved issue would be if some platform needed both
headers.  Does anyone out there know one way or the other?

Robert

-----Original Message-----
From: Dalibor Topic [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Boehne, Robert
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Fixing malloc.h related warning


Hi Robert,

what about

/*
  * Include the header defining malloc.
  *
  * On K&R C compilers, that's <malloc.h>,
  * on ANSI C and ISO C compilers, that's
  * <stdlib.h>.
  *
  */
#if HAVE_STDLIB_H
#  include <stdlib.h>
#else
#  if HAVE_MALLOC_H
#    include <malloc.h>
#  endif
#endif


cheers,
dalibor topic

Boehne, Robert wrote:
> Dalibor,
> 
> This would require a patch that looks for whatever malloc.h is #included for
> in stdlib.h and prefers it in stdlib.h.  So it isn't as simple as 
> s/malloc/stdlib/.
> 
> Robert
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dalibor Topic [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:36 AM
> To: Libtool mailing list
> Subject: Fixing malloc.h related warning
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> bulding code that uses libtool 1.5 on i386-FreeBSD 4.8, I noticed a 
> compiler warning:
> 
>   gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../kaffe-1.1.1/libltdl -I. -g -O2 -c 
> ../../kaffe-1.1.1/libltdl/ltdl.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/ltdl.o
> In file included from ../../kaffe-1.1.1/libltdl/ltdl.c:57:
> /usr/include/malloc.h:2: warning: #warning "this file includes 
> <malloc.h> which is deprecated, use <stdlib.h> instead"
> 
> Could the offending include be removed from source of ltdl.c?
> 
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool