Re: Version numbering

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

> I think when we branch for a release (say the upcoming 1.6), version numbers
> in the branch should continue to be "1.6.<micro><alpha>?", but that the trunk
> should bump its minor number to make it clear the trunk is very different to
> the stable branch: "1.7<alpha>?".  We would of course continue to use "odd"
> letters for CVS revisions, and "even" letters for alpha releases.

Bumping the number to the next planned release level seems like the
usual practice to me.

Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen