[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so)
From: |
Tim Mooney |
Subject: |
RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so) |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:17:10 -0500 (CDT) |
In regard to: RE: Incorrect library suffix on newer HP-UX (.sl vs .so),...:
>
>Tim,
>
>hpux under pa-risc (even 64-bit) still uses the .sl extension even where
>64-bit ELF libraries are concerned. Only under the Intel architecture
>does it use the .so filename. If you want to have a look for yourself,
>HP gives out shell access under their "testdrive" program, which gives
>you access to a slew of different OS/arch combinations (like
>Alpha/FreeBSD & ia64/hpux11).
Robert (and Ross Alexander)-
Thanks for the clarifications! So the stuff I said about no ia64 in
9.x (and 10.x?) is true, as is the stuff about SOM in 9.x and 10.x
(at least on PA -- does anyone remember if 680X0 support was still in 9.x,
and if so if it was also SOM?) but the stuff I said about 11.x is mostly
incorrect. I was going off of memory, which clearly isn't very good...
Tim
--
Tim Mooney address@hidden
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164