Re: bootstrapping CVS libtool

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 13:24, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

You've just woken up, haven't you? :-)

> Scott James Remnant wrote:
> | On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 17:36, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> |
> |
> |>On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> |>
> |>>I use Autoconf 2.58 and Automake 1.7 (latest Debian packages, basically)
> |>>to bootstrap and it works just fine.
> |>
> |>The top of libtool's bootstrap script says:
> |>
> |># Helps bootstrapping libtool, when checked out from CVS
> |># requires at least GNU autoconf 2.58 and GNU automake 1.8.
> |>
> |>Perhaps this comment is in error?
> |>
> |
> | Yes, Makefile.am says:
> |
> | AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS = 1.7 gnu
> |
> |
> | Though, I believe, if you use 1.8 it will take advantage of the new
> | include stuff?
> 
> Yep.  That's right.  We could explain that in the comment in bootstrap instead
> of lying... ;-)
> 
I'll leave you to make that ObviousFix :-)  I'm going to be too busy
examining aclocal *glares at it ruefully* :p

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part