[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug in CVS bootstrap with Automake 1.7

From: Scott James Remnant
Subject: Re: Bug in CVS bootstrap with Automake 1.7
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:25:00 +0000

On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:49, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to see whether we can hack around this, but to be honest, I
> > don't see any problem with requiring 1.8 for our bootstrap now -- it
> > significantly reduces the size of our tar.gz
> I don't see any problem with this requirement either.  Perhaps some
> Linux distribution maintainers would disagree.  Linux distributions
> should be encouraged to use and provide the latest auto* tools.
Theoretically they shouldn't need to worry about our CVS bootstrap, as
they'd be packaging our released tarballs anyway.

Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]