[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another stable release?
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: Another stable release? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:32:04 +0000 |
On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> >
> > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am
> > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any objections.
> > >
> > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3?
> > >
> > 1.5.4 :-)
>
> I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release:
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00069.html
>
This one's tied up in a fix to the "preferring .la libraries over
earlier non-.la libraries" patch. I'm back on top of things now, so
expect the combined patch RSN (I'm trying to get LT_LANG/LT_TAG out of
the door atm.)
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html
>
This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch
branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched.
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html
>
These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches
against HEAD?)
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part