[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another stable release?
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Another stable release? |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Mar 2004 14:56:31 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 06:32:04PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 17:47, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 03:00:27PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 14:51, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'll probably have some free time toward the end of this month, and am
> > > > volunteering to roll a release of branch-1-5 if nobody has any
> > > > objections.
> > > >
> > > > Would that be 1.5.4 or 1.5.3?
> > > >
> > > 1.5.4 :-)
> >
> > I'd like to see the following patches in the next 1.5 release:
>
> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00092.html
> >
> This needs a version written for HEAD as well, we shouldn't patch
> branch-1-5 until HEAD is patched.
Done.
> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00131.html
> > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-03/msg00018.html
>
> These two need checking and applying to HEAD first (are the patches
> against HEAD?)
Will do now. We never submit patches for HEAD as we don't use it in
production.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)