[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:19:01 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 10:42:05PM +0100, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> On 14 Apr 2004, at 18:55, Albert Chin wrote:
>
> >I already have it done for Solaris, HP-UX, Tru64 UNIX, and IRIX. My
> >patch is for the 1.5 branch. I'll forward-port to the 1.6 branch and
> >post the patch in a few days when I have time.
>
> Okay, great. Thanks :-) This needs applying to branch-1-5 too, right?
> I can't find it in the ChangeLog...
It's probably not a good idea to commit to 1.5. Seems like too big a
change.
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Albert Chin, 2004/04/12
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/12
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/13
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/13
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/13
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Albert Chin, 2004/04/13
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/13
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: Consequence of using ld to link libraries on Solaris, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/14