Re: Missing ".so" in .la file

[Bob Friesenhahn]

Does 'make install' result in shared libraries with the ".so" part 
similarly missing from their names?  I ran across a package recently 
(using libtool) that had this problem under Solaris.  Regenerating the 
build with local auto* tools solved the problem, but if the problem 
occurs for more than one person, there is certainly a bug somewhere.

Bob

On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Grzegorz Jakacki wrote:
> This is a fragment of some libocc_mop.la file created by
> libtool 1.5.6:
>
>      # The name that we can dlopen(3).
>      dlname='libocc_mop.0'
>
>      # Names of this library.
>      library_names='libocc_mop.0.0.0 libocc_mop.0 libocc_mop'
>
>      # The name of the static archive.
>      old_library='libocc_mop.a'
>
> Why no '.so' in dlname and library_names ???
>
> Thanks
> Grzegorz
>
>
>
> ---
> Free C++ frontend library:   http://opencxx.sourceforge.net
> China from the inside:       http://www.staryhutong.com
> Sender of this e-mail:       http://www.dziupla.net/gj/cv
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool

======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen