[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Portability of -no-undefined

From: Noah Misch
Subject: Re: Portability of -no-undefined
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:42:43 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:08:26PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

> On at least Mac OS X libraries built with -no-undefined are different from 
> those built without. Why should we not take advantage of any extra features 
> offered by the toolchain/OS for libraries with no undefined symbols.

I overlooked that.

> Also testing for equivalence of libraries on Mac OS X is not going to work 
> (unless you write a special test program) as libraries often contain a 
> timestamp in the mach headers.

Scratch the idea, then.  I do still wonder why -no-undefined libraries differ on

Thanks for the corrections, Peter.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]