[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building all static
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: Building all static |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:29:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) |
Hey Bruce!
Bruce Korb wrote:
> ``-static'' needs to imply the common and ordnary meaning of ``static''.
> "libtool" is a less common and ordinary command than either "gcc" or "ld".
> It is not a directly obvious thing that you would need to add the qualifier
> "all-" to it in order to actually get static linking.
>
> Being obvious is far more important
Not forgetting the excellent advantage that ./configure LDFLAGS=-static would
behave as expected. In fact, if configure didn't run a test that noticed the
difference between `ld/cc -static' and `libtool --mode=link ld/cc -static',
then it could be made to behave even better than expected by cleverly omitting
the system libraries from the list of statically linked objects :-)
> than compatibility for the few users who:
>
> 1. use -static
> 2. don't want fully static
> 3. would have a hard time coping with the change
>
> :-) Cheers - Bruce
What he said :-) As long as they are `few'. I happen to think that they
really are.
And for the very few who really really want fully static, they can still use
-all-static to stop libtool trying to outsmart them.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: Building all static, (continued)
Re: Building all static, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Bruce Korb, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
Re: Building all static, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/03
Re: Building all static, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/02
Re: Building all static, Bill Moseley, 2004/11/03