libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TODO


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: TODO
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:48:27 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:29:37PM CET:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:46:09PM CET:
> > I just want to get some possibilities out there into the ether. Feel free 
> > to add more bits/say which bits are silly.
> 
> branch 2.0:
> 
> I would like to see one arch which has no dynamic linking but still
> passes the relevant libltdl preopen tests.  Anyone?

Decide whether we also allocate the slist* prefix in libltdl;
document the resulting namespace requirements or wrap under lt_*.

Regards,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]