[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TODO
From: |
Jacob Meuser |
Subject: |
Re: TODO |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:00:28 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 03:01:06PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 10:51 -0800, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:45:10PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > It does assume that all library dependencies are registered, yes. This
> > > has never been a problem, because we've never found any Libtool-produced
> > > library that doesn't have all dependencies registered.
> > >
> > > If this isn't the case, and at one time Libtool never registered all of
> > > the dependencies, we should check for that. Otherwise I don't see the
> > > need -- we can assume sanity from our own output.
> >
> > for a long time, libtool did not handle -pthread properly.
> >
> It still doesn't, the current situation is a botch that produces the
> right results but does it in the wrong way. Libraries should record
> what compiler/linker flags they need (-pthread is not a dependency
> library).
record how? in the dependency_libs section of an .la file? you seem
to be saying no, so then where?
> > I can point to at least a few .la files on my system that do
> > not have -pthread or even other required libraries registered.
> >
> I'd be quite shocked if the current version of Libtool produces
> libraries with -pthread in dependency_libs; I specifically wrote the
> patch to prevent that, because it causes a lot of problems.
if -pthread is needed but missing, then I get errors about missing
symbols, much like if a library is missing from the link command.
--
<address@hidden>
> Scott
> --
> Have you ever, ever felt like this?
> Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
- Re: TODO, (continued)
- Re: TODO, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Scott James Remnant, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO,
Jacob Meuser <=
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Howard Chu, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Daniel Reed, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/15
- Re: TODO, Daniel Reed, 2004/11/16
- Re: TODO, Jacob Meuser, 2004/11/16