[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: link_all_deplibs

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: link_all_deplibs
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:03:46 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i


* Christoph Wellner wrote on Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 03:38:42PM CET:
> Well, contains the information that it depends on libB. But I  
> still get the linker-error.
> Perhaps it is important, that the libs are not 'installed' but stil in the  
> directory-tree of our source-code. \
> Just to make myself clear:
> compiling and the linking after the compile works. but when I want to  
> start the application, it claims about missing librariy libB, wich is  
> definately build and part of our package. ldd says in the 1st line, that  
> it can't find libB, but in the 2nd line, it says, that libB is located in  
> directory xy. So, it seems, that the linker finds the lib correctly, but  
> does not update the paths.

This is all not helpful.  Please read[1].

Please provide a small recipe how we can reproduce what you are doing,
or at least post the rules you use to create your libraries and
programs, i.e., Makefile or snippets.

Your description lacks way to much information -- post real information,
cut and paste rather than copy by hand, be concise, report your system
(you have only revealed the operating system, not the architecture),
read [1] again, cut and paste the *exact* commands that fail, together
with their output.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]