Re: Bug in libtoolize

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Hi Jeff,

Jeff Squyres wrote:
> I see that there was a patch committed on this, but I think it's not
> quite right, specifically in the Makefile.am area.
> 
> In the top-level Makefile.am, the following statement was added:
> 
>     cd libltdl && $(MAKE) local-install-files
> 
> However, there's no such target in libltdl/Makefile.am (nor
> libltdl/Makefile).  Was install-local-data meant, instead?

D'oh!  Missed that when backporting.  Thanks, should be fixed in CVS
now, by 121-gary-remove-local-install-files-call.patch.

Cheers,
        Gary.
-- 
Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature