[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:29:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Gary,
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 11:56:31PM CEST:
> On 22 Aug 2005, at 21:00, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> >Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >>Furthermore, it has at least this serious bug in its new
> >>functionality:
> >>- using libltdl but not as subpackage does not work as advertised
> >> (this bug is in part a documentation bug -- LTDL_INIT needs to be
> >> suitably documented -- but also the AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS call from
> >> LT_WITH_LTDL needs to be made configurable)
> >
> >Hmm... I'll look into this when --patch-23 is resolved.
>
> This concern was just because cvs diff hadn't picked up all of --
> patch-23 right? Everything seems to work fine here...
No.
> Regardless, LTDL_INIT is not documented at the moment, and I'm not
> sure we want to explicitly support use of libltdl except as a
> subpackage. Although it has been possible to do so for quite some
> time (if only because libtool itself has done so on and off over the
> last few years), we have never really *designed* an interface for it.
> Post-2.0, we can always firm up a long term interface, document it and
> *then* make a commitment to support that interface in the future.
I don't understand this paragraph at all. From what I could gather,
this was one of *the* new features to be advertised for the next stable
version. When Bob reported several times that it was nonfunctional,
never was there a reply of yours stating this wasn't intended feature.
While I can see you backing up because you want to move closer to this
release, I cannot understand how you can argue now that this was not a
feature users should be able to profit from.
Regards,
Ralf
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Noah Misch, 2005/08/22
Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/22
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Gary V. Vaughan, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Albert Chin, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/23
- Re: branch-2-0 vs CVS HEAD, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/08/23