libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tagdemo test / -c -o


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: tagdemo test / -c -o
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:11:16 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi Tim,

* Tim Rice wrote on Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:34:18AM CET:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I guess you should be able to use this manually-written rule as a
> > workaround:
> > 
> > .cpp.$(OBJEXT):
> >         $(CXXCOMPILE) -c $<
> 
> Or this patch to automake
> ......
> --- automake-1.9.6/automake.in.old    2005-06-30 14:17:13.000000000 -0700
> +++ automake-1.9.6/automake.in        2005-10-29 18:31:51.565961323 -0700
> @@ -691,7 +691,6 @@
>                  'compile' => '$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) 
> $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)',
>                  'compiler' => 'CXXCOMPILE',
>                  'compile_flag' => '-c',
> -                'output_flag' => '-o',
>                  'libtool_tag' => 'CXX',
>                  'lder' => 'CXXLD',
>                  'ld' => '$(CXX)',

No.  :)

Above workaround works only because
- we do not use subdir-objects; in fact, we do not use subdirs at all,
- none of the non-libtool objects (i.e., the `.o' ones) use per-target
  flags

It's really just appropriate for the tagdemo case, not for Automake in
general.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]