[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: lt_dlopen with modules and no .la
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:04:45 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Pierre,

* Pierre Ossman wrote on Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 10:45:11AM CET:
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >
> >>What happens if the path specified by 'base_name' does not include a 
> >>'.'?  Does it crash?
> >
> >Good point. It should be surrounded by an 'if (ext)'.

HEAD also sets `name' correctly if `ext' is NULL, unlike your most
recent patch.

> >>Note that the code in development libtool is quite different than the 
> >>ltdl.c you used.
> >
> >I'm using 1.5.20 here. That was the newest version when we did the 
> >upgrade a couple of weeks ago. I'm trying to be a user, not a developer 
> >so running a CVS version wasn't really planned. ;)

I'm sorry.  I'm trying to get 2.0 done so we don't need a 1.5.24..
but if there'll be one, we can backport the fix from HEAD.

> New version of the patch (against branch-1-5). HEAD seems to do the 
> right thing as-is.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]