[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:03:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
Hello,
* Albert Chin wrote on Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 10:14:39PM CEST:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 02:20:45PM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > A challenge is that in libtool 2.0, the libtool script is not
> > generated until the end of the configure script run (an
> > `enhancement' in 2.0) so it is not available for use.
>
> Didn't Ralf address this?
Yes, well, Gary did: LT_OUTPUT. See the second test in
tests/early-libtool.at (and the documentation).
Cheers,
Ralf
- LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Tim Mooney, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Albert Chin, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Albert Chin, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Tim Mooney, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Russ Allbery, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Tim Mooney, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Tim Mooney, 2006/07/03
- Re: LT_* equivalent to AC_CHECK_LIB?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2006/07/03