Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?

[Charles Wilson]

Charles Wilson wrote:
> (3) where the PIC resolver library is used *like a static library* when 
> building dependent shared libraries -- that is, used to satisfy 
> undefined symbols in the shared library if -no-undefined, but where the 
> objects in the PIC resolver library are 

NOT

> included wholesale via 
> --whole-archive/--no-whole-archive -- and better yet, on win32 they 
> should be excluded from auto-export using -Wl,--exclude-lib -Wl,<PIC 
> resolver library name>. 

oops.

--
Chuck