Re: [RFC] New library "type" needed?

[Bernd Jendrissek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 03:42:54PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
> but why would you ever want to build libbfd shared?  It is always
> built static by default even on ELF systems

Hmm, not on my system.  It's shared here.  And a good thing too, as I
don't want a trillion megabytes of --enable-targets=all libbfd
statically linked into all of ld, nm, strings, objdump, objcopy, and
whatever others I forget right now.

- -- 
There is a lot of food in a supermarket, too, but a supermarket isn't
the best place to hold a dinner party. -- Christopher Faylor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGB5bEwyMv24BBd/gRAuSzAJ98pyX6EuhiA+wY9so0UNBxzFhpVgCgmB2A
cHP8hEbD7BU/ibCDoBu8Jyo=
=dUA2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----