[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Migration to Git?
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: Migration to Git? |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:56:11 +0100 |
Hallo All,
Catching up on my mailing list backlog... *blush*
On 1 Oct 2007, at 16:10, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007, Benoit SIGOURE wrote:
I think that the current priority for libtool *must* be to finish
the first 2.X release. Any distraction (regardless of apparent
merit) will simply postpone that release even further.
Yes, that's right. When will this happen? Is there a TODO list
of things that are still to be done before we can release 2.X?
I'd be glad to help if I can.
Yes, there is a TODO list. Gary is working on the remaining big
task (deciding how to build/use libltdl in a project). Since he is
likely to strongly prefer git, then this could serve as extra
incentive to get the task completed. :-)
The task proper is done, but I'm flat out on a big release schedule
at work. As soon as I have a couple of days outside the release
(where I can stand to be still on my computer) I just need to write a
test case or two, and check that everything is behaving as expected...
Once I started managing my patch queue with quilt I gave up
maintaining the Arch repositories, so they are certainly very out of
date by now (if they even still work at all). But you're right, we
need to get past the release first, and once the dust has settled on
that, I would love nothing more than to move from CVS to a modern
SCM :-D
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: address@hidden
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_ Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part