[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Favoring static linking at configure time

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Favoring static linking at configure time
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 21:55:02 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)


* Brian Dessent wrote on Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 07:20:40PM CET:
> Benoit Sigoure wrote:
> > > Of course there is: -Wl,-Bstatic -lfoo -Wl,-Bdynamic
> > 
> > Hmm I didn't know this.  How portable is it?  I guess a gccism, but
> > is it even portable across versions/ports of GCC?
> -B seems to be fairly portable; all of the following support it:

I implemented support for it in Libtool a while ago:

it was postponed due to "2.2 being out real soon now", and it being
possibly destabilizing to HEAD.

Maybe some data points to the end that it's rather stable (I think I
tested it pretty well at some point) would help.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]