[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make -s
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: make -s |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:02:47 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Bob Rossi wrote:
> Well, I might be over simplifying things because I don't understand the
> big picture. When I type 'make -s' I assume that the compiler commands
> that make kicks off will not be sent to stdout/stderr.
You do not see the compiler commands kicked off by make, you see the
compiler commands kicked off by libtool...
This has been discussed before and is, IIRC, the reason that Ralf
introduced LIBTOOLFLAGS in automake.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
- make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/09
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s,
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: make -s, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Mike Frysinger, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Bob Rossi, 2008/01/10
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/11
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/13
- Re: make -s, Richard Hacker, 2008/01/14
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/14
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/14
- Re: make -s, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/01/14
- Re: make -s, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/14