Re: Libtool 2.1b test results

[Peter O'Gorman]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:49:26PM CET:
>> The dynamic linker checks are called for every tag, but produce no
>> tagged variables. I was going to propose something like the attached
>> patch at some point, but thought it best to wait 'til after 2.x is
>> released in case it broke something.... maybe should not have waited.
> 
> How about if you apply the bit of your patch for _LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG
> only?  That seems far safer, and in fact ok to me before 2.2, assuming
> no testsuite regressions.

Ok, I applied this.

Thanks,
Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com

2008-02-20  Peter O'Gorman  <address@hidden>

        * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG): Do not call the
        _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER macro here.
        Reported by Mike Frysinger <address@hidden>

Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/libtool/libtool/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.136
diff -u -r1.136 libtool.m4
--- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4       16 Feb 2008 03:46:06 -0000      1.136
+++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4       20 Feb 2008 18:22:11 -0000
@@ -6832,7 +6832,6 @@
   _LT_COMPILER_C_O($1)
   _LT_COMPILER_FILE_LOCKS($1)
   _LT_LINKER_SHLIBS($1)
-  _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER($1)
   _LT_LINKER_HARDCODE_LIBPATH($1)
 
   _LT_CONFIG($1)