[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's recommended if tests are failing?
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: what's recommended if tests are failing? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 11:22:18 -0500 |
On 6 Mar 2008, at 10:29, snowcrash+libtool wrote:
as they're both 'release versions' now, if 1.5x tests are passing
100%, but 2.2x is showing numerous failures, what's the general
consensus on which to use?
2.2 has *much* better test coverage. Probably, 1.5x would also fail
the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!
2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable
15x?
Use 2.2 and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to
address@hidden, so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next
month.
:-)
Cheers,
Gary
--
())_. Email me: address@hidden
( '/ Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
/ )= ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part