[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's recommended if tests are failing?
From: |
snowcrash+libtool |
Subject: |
Re: what's recommended if tests are failing? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 08:30:27 -0800 |
hi,
> 2.2 has *much* better test coverage. Probably, 1.5x would also fail
> the better tests... and more of them than 2.2!
that's a good point. thx.
> > 2.2x is 'ok', but the tests are problematic? or, drop back to stable
> > 15x?
>
> Use 2.2
given the above pt, clear.
> and report any failures you see in the new improved tests to
> address@hidden, so that we can fix them in time for 2.2.2 next
> month.
already done the other day. pending ... :-)