[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: move to git
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: move to git |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:28:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Andreas Schwab wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:14:12AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > GNU Libtool's primary source repository is now managed with git:
> > <http://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=libtool>
> >
> > Note that there were several conversions, so the current repo has been
> > rewound and is not a continuation of the earlier, read-only git repo.
>
> There are now many release-* tags that point to the same commit, which
> is preceded by a series of commits that only change the file libtool.prj
> (apparently some kind of control file for PRCS). In the CVS repository
> these tags were all conntected to different changesets.
That would be release-0-6b through release-1-2c, right?
I don't quite understand what happened. With the repo converted from
CVS, the tag SHAs were all different, but they already pointed to the
same tree object. After the filter-branch rewrite, they now all have
the same SHA. I suspect the bug happens earlier. Jim, can you take
a look?
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: move to git, (continued)
- Re: move to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Eric Blake, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/17
Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/18