[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: move to git
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: move to git |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Apr 2008 11:53:23 +0200 |
Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Andreas Schwab wrote on Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:14:12AM CEST:
>> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > GNU Libtool's primary source repository is now managed with git:
>> > <http://savannah.gnu.org/git/?group=libtool>
>> >
>> > Note that there were several conversions, so the current repo has been
>> > rewound and is not a continuation of the earlier, read-only git repo.
>>
>> There are now many release-* tags that point to the same commit, which
>> is preceded by a series of commits that only change the file libtool.prj
>> (apparently some kind of control file for PRCS). In the CVS repository
>> these tags were all conntected to different changesets.
>
> That would be release-0-6b through release-1-2c, right?
>
> I don't quite understand what happened. With the repo converted from
> CVS, the tag SHAs were all different, but they already pointed to the
> same tree object. After the filter-branch rewrite, they now all have
> the same SHA. I suspect the bug happens earlier. Jim, can you take
> a look?
Hi Ralf,
I'm beginning to think that our time might be better spent
investigating an alternate conversion method: cvs2git.
Unfortunately, I might not have time for that right away.
- Re: move to git, (continued)
- Re: move to git, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Eric Blake, 2008/04/16
- Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/17
Re: move to git, Andreas Schwab, 2008/04/18