[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Don't install .la files when --no-la-files is used

From: Kurt Roeckx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't install .la files when --no-la-files is used
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 18:06:16 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 07:31:47AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I feel like today I just watched the movie "Groundhog Day" another 20 times.
> >  This topic re-emerges just as often as the one about whether list replies
> > should default to the original sender, or to the list.
> >
> > It seems that there is an issue for Linux distribution maintainers. What
> > needs to be done about it so that this topic does not come up so often?
> I haven't followed the topic for that long, but it think this is that
> patch Debian uses which many other distros have picked up:
> So, what would it take to get something like that upstream?

There are a few problems with this patch.  See:

It's also not complete:

> Obviously,
> it would first have to be ported to 2.2. Then, it seems to me that it
> should probably use a feature test rather than a platform glob. I
> think Ralf called this transitive dependency closures.

The patch has been ported to 2.2 and the first link you showed
is the one for 2.2.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]