Re: uninstalled modules do not build .so files

[Dan Nicholson]

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 3:55 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On Tue 23 Dec 2008 19:25, "Dan Nicholson" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> Unpack the attached tarball (it will create its own directory). It is a
>>> standard autotooled project with one file, foo.c.
>>>
>>> Expected results: ./autogen.sh && make produces a .so file in .libs.
>>
>> If you create a noinst libtool library, it will be static. Change to
>> lib_LTLIBRARIES or whatever.
>
> How do I then create an .so for a test suite? check_LTLIBRARIES doesn't
> do it either.
>
> I do not want to install this module.

Did it used to work that a noinst library compiled with -module would
give you a shared library? I've never tried to do that before.

Crap, I just realized that I forgot to cc: libtool and this got off list.

--
Dan