[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of -flat_namespace on darwin
|
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
|
Subject: |
Re: use of -flat_namespace on darwin |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:30:38 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 |
Hi Adam,
On 12/22/2009 04:56 PM, Adam Mercer wrote:
In one of our projects we are experiencing a problem which seems to be
related to the fact that the -flat_namespace option is not being
passed to the linker, looking into why this is the case I see the
following code in libtool.m4:
What is the problem?
I see that the -flat_namespace is only passed for 10.0, 10.1, and
10.2. Why is this? Are there adverse effects to using a flat namespace
on more recent OS X versions?
Two level namespace is the default, last time I checked every library on
the system was two level namespace (there used to be one flat namespace
X11 library, I think that changed). Two level namespace is faster, and
solves numerous portability problems.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com