[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool versioning
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libtool versioning |
Date: |
Mon, 3 May 2010 19:58:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28) |
Hello,
* Matěj Týč wrote on Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:45:26PM CEST:
> If I have understood correctly, the whole LTversion stuff has only one
> purpose - to inform users what have they installed.
Wrong. It provides a fairly portable abstraction of different
versioning schemes implemented in different operating systems/libc's.
By definition, libtool cannot do better than what the native system
provides. In cases where the native system provides even less than what
the libtool versioning is able to express, such as w32, it has to resort
to library renaming to get even a chance of a kind of "versioning".
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: libtool versioning, (continued)
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/04
- Re: libtool versioning, Jason Curl, 2010/05/06
- Re: libtool versioning, Peter Rosin, 2010/05/06
- Re: libtool versioning, Michel Briand, 2010/05/03
- Re: libtool versioning, Tor Lillqvist, 2010/05/04
Re: libtool versioning, Matěj Týč, 2010/05/03
Re: libtool versioning,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
Re: libtool versioning, Jason Curl, 2010/05/06