[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: -no-undefined on Win32

From: Bob Friesenhahn
Subject: Re: -no-undefined on Win32
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 20:58:56 -0500 (CDT)
User-agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14)

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Evgeny Grin wrote:

Good. But requiring "-no-undefined" for Win32 flag lower probability of 
successful compile.

In what way does it lower the probability of a successful compile? Static linkage is much more portable than dynamic.

The situation you outlined is due to a defective package preparation/build environment. A proper build has just one version of a given library in a link.

Regardless, it is very unlikely that libtool will react to your plea (if it does at all) in a timely fashion and so you are best advised to fix your build without relying on significant changes in libtool.

Bob Friesenhahn
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]