Re: -no-undefined on Win32

[Bob Friesenhahn]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Evgeny Grin wrote:
> Good. But requiring "-no-undefined" for Win32 flag lower probability of 
> successful compile.

In what way does it lower the probability of a successful compile? 
Static linkage is much more portable than dynamic.

The situation you outlined is due to a defective package 
preparation/build environment.  A proper build has just one version of 
a given library in a link.

Regardless, it is very unlikely that libtool will react to your plea 
(if it does at all) in a timely fashion and so you are best advised to 
fix your build without relying on significant changes in libtool.

Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/