|
From: | Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: | Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4 |
Date: | Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:46:18 -0600 (CST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote:
On 02/06/2015 12:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you are although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3. These timings are foroptimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux system using -j 12:I think that we can't see obviously slowdown by "make -jN", but "make -j1" will. And bash is much slower than dash, I'm trying to figure out why.
It seems like this issue is already corrected in the source tree but you are correct that the issue is much more apparent with -j1.
Optimized: 2.4.2 : 3:43.43 2.4.5 : 4:33.11 Non-Optimized: 2.4.2 : 1:21.21 2.4.5 : 2:05.48We need a test case which is executed before every major release to make sure that a performance regression has not been introduced.
Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |