[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4
From: |
Richard Purdie |
Subject: |
Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4 |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:05:53 +0000 |
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 10:45 +0800, Robert Yang wrote:
> On 02/06/2015 10:46 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015, Robert Yang wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 02/06/2015 12:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >>> I am not seeing quite the difference between libtool releases that you are
> >>> although I see a big slowdown starting with 2.4.3. These timings are for
> >>> optimized builds of GraphicsMagick on a 12-core GNU/Linux system using -j
> >>> 12:
> >>
> >> I think that we can't see obviously slowdown by "make -jN",
> >> but "make -j1" will. And bash is much slower than dash, I'm trying to
> >> figure out why.
> >
> > It seems like this issue is already corrected in the source tree but you are
>
> Yes, I think that the git repo has fixed the problem:
>
> commit 408cfb9c5fa8a666917167ffb806cb19deded429
> Author: Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri Feb 6 12:58:34 2015 +0000
>
> libtool: don't execute automake and autoconf on every invocation.
In an effort to get to the bottom of this I made a git bisection, timing
the performance of building xz with make -j1 using each different
libtool.
The issues come down to this commit:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/libtool.git/commit/?id=0a42997c6032b9550a009a271552e811bfbcc430
libtool: rewritten over funclib.sh instead of general.m4sh.
Before that, I get a time of about 20s, after it, 39s. If I cherry-pick
in the fix in master mentioned above, I get 27s.
So whilst things are better (thanks!), the above change is still causing
a regression in the performance somewhere else. Any ideas what else in
that rather large change may be causing this?
Cheers,
Richard
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, (continued)
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Bob Friesenhahn, 2015/02/03
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/03
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/04
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Bob Friesenhahn, 2015/02/04
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/04
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/05
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Bob Friesenhahn, 2015/02/05
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/06
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Bob Friesenhahn, 2015/02/06
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/08
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4,
Richard Purdie <=
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Peter Rosin, 2015/02/09
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Richard Purdie, 2015/02/09
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Richard Purdie, 2015/02/10
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Gary V. Vaughan, 2015/02/10
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Richard Purdie, 2015/02/10
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Robert Yang, 2015/02/10
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Gary V. Vaughan, 2015/02/10
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Peter Johansson, 2015/02/06
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Peter Rosin, 2015/02/06
- Re: Performance issue of libtool-2.4.4, Gary V. Vaughan, 2015/02/06