[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re[2]: MSW DLLs support in libtool

From: Nick Bowler
Subject: Re: Re[2]: MSW DLLs support in libtool
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:02:29 -0500

On 2/10/16, Vadim Zeitlin <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:29:40 -0500 Nick Bowler <address@hidden> wrote:
> NB> On 2/10/16, Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden> wrote:
> NB> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Peter Rosin wrote:
> NB> >> I agree wholeheartedly with the notion that --disable-static
> NB> >> should end up in a failure and not somehow degrade to a static
> NB> >> build anyway.
> NB> >
> NB> > Is this not the case?  I have seen builds on Windows fail due to
> NB> > using --disable-static.
> NB>
> NB> I just tested it on a library which does not specify -no-undefined,
> NB> and therefore won't be built as a shared lib on Windows:
> This just doesn't correspond to my experience: when cross compiling from
> Linux using libtool 2.4.2, a static library is created.

I cannot reproduce it.  The build fails as expected.

Can you reproduce with the latest release of libtool (2.4.6)?  2.4.2 is
very old.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]