Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2496 in lilypond: Patch: 30 day webathon for kickstarter support

[lilypond]

Comment #13 on issue 2496 by address@hidden: Patch: 30 day webathon for  
kickstarter support
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2496

"has had several LGTMs" is only accurate if you count Patchy the autobot  
in, and
a) those don't accumulate but merely report the status of the last patch.
b) more LGTM from Patchy mean either redundant runs or a patch that needed  
several iterations.
Now it is true that there was _one_ LGTM in the course of the discussion  
from Graham (though not on the last iteration of he patch) and the caveat  
of that LGTM has been addressed.

Maybe we should change the text from the accept-patch command and reserve  
LGTM to humans rather than an automated review using a human only as  
compoment?  Before I recognized it as an autogenerated text, I tended to  
assign more meaning to it than appropropriate as well.