[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3096 in lilypond: Flag style or stencil change
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3096 in lilypond: Flag style or stencil change has no effect on metronome mark |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Jan 2013 23:57:07 +0000 |
Comment #1 on issue 3096 by address@hidden: Flag style or stencil
change has no effect on metronome mark
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3096
Thomas Morley posted here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2013-01/msg00096.html
to clarify that he identifies three bugs arising from Karol's original
report, as follows:
Hi Colin,
I see three bugs
(1)
The markup-commands \note-by-number and \note don't support other
flag-styles than default.
This will result in ugly output.
I'd consider this of type: enhancment.
Example:
\version "2.17.9"
\markup {
\override #'(style . mensural)
{
\note-by-number #3 #0 #1
\note #"8" #1
}
}
(2)
`format-metronome-markup' and `metronome-markup' from
/scm/translation-functions.scm don't support other note/flag-styles
than default.
(Even if \note-by-number would support them.)
(Can't imagine an example)
This is part of the problem Karol reported initially.
I'd consider this of type: enhancment.
(3)
In mensural-style the stem and flag aren't well combined.
Example:
\version "2.17.9"
{
\override Flag.style = #'mensural
\override Stem.thickness = #1.0
\override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
c'8
}
I'd consider this of type ugly.
Regards,
Harm