lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3125 in lilypond: Wrong about window for LilyP


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3125 in lilypond: Wrong about window for LilyPad
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:40:30 +0000


Comment #4 on issue 3125 by address@hidden: Wrong about window for LilyPad
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3125

"You have more work to read the mail from the user, then giving him your permission" ... Usually when a report is reasonably complete, there is no action required from the user.

The problem with your assumption is that "you" is a single person. It isn't. we have a team specializing on entering and categorizing bug reports who do mostly nothing else. That means that a report entered by them will then be given the proper attention by developers (of which we have fewer) without wasting their time.

In fact, "bug report duty" is scheduled on a daily basis, so there really is only _one_ person busy with a bug report in addition to the submitter until it is complete and useful.

Now of course you consider your own bugs important enough to warrant the attention of all developers immediately, including non-Windows developers. But if everybody does it like that, less work gets accomplished all in all. For that reason, we have a division of labor that has been tested and honed over years. The instructions are consistent with that division of labor.

Now you consider yourself better qualified to judge how we should be running things than those who have been running them for years. It is unlikely that you are correct in this estimate if you have not even bothered looking how and why we are doing things: that only has a reasonable chance of being better when you base it on the assumption that everybody except yourself is an idiot.

It is an assumption easy to make for technically skilled people, but in a setting where every other involved person is technically skilled as well as experienced with his task, it is not necessarily uncontestable.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]